I’m as shocked as anyone else regarding the devastation in Japan, the scale of the human tragedy is inconceivable, however the main story that seems to be circling the news, especially in Canada, is that of this supposed “Meltdown”
Now first of all, Meltdown conjures up images of Chernobyl and the abandoned town of Pripyat. To use the same term and toss it around so loosely regarding the incident at Fukushima is reckless. They are nowhere near the same type of incident, and to draw comparisons is tantamount to disinformation.
Chernobyl, not the same as Fukushima
The main issue in my opinion is a general ignorance as to the workings of a nuclear reactor, and nuclear physics in general. People are terrified of things they don’t fully understand, and nuclear power, unfortunately, is one of these things.
It’s not helped by the media supplying incredibly anti-nuclear commentary, referring to everything as a disaster, or “meltdown”. Nuclear power when managed correctly is incredibly safe and clean, producing no carbon emissions at all, the only waste is nuclear byproducts that can be stored underground to decay into more stable elements.
For example, the media was reporting yesterday that that Fukushima I was venting radioactive steam, however what the media failed to mention is that the steam contains radionuclides with very short half-lives, so after they were vented they rapidly decayed into stable, non-radioactive elements.
A half-life is not something the media concerns itself with it’s content to allow people to believe that this steam is lethal, even though the amount of radiation measured during the venting was equivalent to that of a chest x-ray, not to mention that those elements will rapidly decay and be sent out to sea, never to be seen again!
The real danger comes from cracked containment vessels, as was shown with the obsolete RBMK reactor types responsible for the Chernobyl disaster, however the BWR reactors at Fukushima have 3 levels of containment, the zircaloy fuel rod sheathes, the concrete core vessel, and then the outer containment vessel, even if the fuel rods melt down, they will not breach the containment, and it will not continue burning through the planet.
The future of nuclear power is a difficult one, its about overcoming peoples innate fear of something they don’t fully understand, coupled with the media fanning the flames. However if we all want to keep using the same amount of electricity, and we’re committed to doing all we can to save the planet then we need to start the process to ditch our carbon economy.
The first step comes with replacing our dirty fossil fuel burning power stations with clean nuclear power. Renewables are great, but they don’t produce the amount of power required to run nations, nuclear fission power is our best bet for staving off the effects of climate change in the immediate short term, while we develop ways to bring nuclear fusion reactors up to industrial scale. To put a halt on all nuclear power developments would be incredibly short sighted. After all, we all need electricity, where else are we gonna’ get it from?

Not gonna be enough!